• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Detection of Soil-Transmitted Helminths in a Post-Treatment Setting in Western Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Assefa-chs-res.pdf (609.7Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Assefa, Liya M.
    Crellen, Thomas
    Kepha, Stella
    Kihara, Jimmy H.
    Njenga, Sammy M.
    Pullan, Rachel L.
    Brooker, Simon J.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objectives: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the Kato-Katz and Mini-FLOTAC methods for detection of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) in a post-treatment setting in western Kenya. A cost analysis also explores the cost implications of collecting samples during school surveys when compared to household surveys. Methods: Stool samples were collected from children (n = 652) attending 18 schools in Bungoma County and diagnosed by the Kato-Katz and Mini-FLOTAC coprological methods. Sensitivity and additional diagnostic performance measures were analyzed using Bayesian latent class modeling. Financial and economic costs were calculated for all survey and diagnostic activities, and cost per child tested, cost per case detected and cost per STH infection correctly classified were estimated. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of various survey parameters on cost estimates. Results: Both diagnostic methods exhibited comparable sensitivity for detection of any STH species over single and consecutive day sampling: 52.0% for single day Kato-Katz; 49.1% for single-day Mini-FLOTAC; 76.9% for consecutive day Kato-Katz; and 74.1% for consecutive day Mini-FLOTAC. Diagnostic performance did not differ significantly between methods for the different STH species. Use of Kato-Katz with school-based sampling was the lowest cost scenario for cost per child tested ($10.14) and cost per case correctly classified ($12.84). Cost per case detected was lowest for Kato-Katz used in community-based sampling ($128.24). Sensitivity analysis revealed the cost of case detection for any STH decreased nonlinearly as prevalence rates increased and was influenced by the number of samples collected. Conclusions: The Kato-Katz method was comparable in diagnostic sensitivity to the Mini-FLOTAC method, but afforded greater cost-effectiveness. Future work is required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of STH surveillance in different settings.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/4405
    Collections
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV