Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMpimbaza, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorBabikako, Harriet
dc.contributor.authorRutazanna, Damian
dc.contributor.authorKaramagi, Charles
dc.contributor.authorNdeezi, Grace
dc.contributor.authorKatahoire, Anne
dc.contributor.authorOpigo, Jimmy
dc.contributor.authorSnow, Robert W.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-06T11:33:36Z
dc.date.available2023-07-06T11:33:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04048-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/12038
dc.description.abstractBackground: Appropriate malaria management is a key malaria control strategy. The objective of this study was to determine health care worker adherence levels to malaria case management guidelines in the Busoga sub-region, Uganda. Methods: Health facility assessments, health care worker (HCW), and patient exit interview (PEI) surveys were con- ducted at government and private health facilities in the sub-region. All health centres (HC) IVs, IIIs, and a sample of HC IIs, representative of the tiered structure of outpatient service delivery at the district level were targeted. HCWs at these facilities were eligible for participation in the study. For PEIs, 210 patients of all ages presenting with a history of fever for outpatient care at selected facilities in each district were targeted. Patient outcome measures included testing rates, adherence to treatment, dispensing and counselling services as per national guidelines. The primary outcome was appropriate malaria case management, defined as the proportion of patients tested and only prescribed artemether-lumefantrine (AL) if positive. HCW readiness (e.g., training, supervision) and health facility capacity (e.g. availability of diagnostics and anti-malarials) to provide malaria case management were also assessed. Data were weighted to cater for the disproportionate representation of HC IIs in the study sample. Results: A total of 3936 patients and 1718 HCW from 392 facilities were considered in the analysis. The median age of patients was 14 years; majority (63.4%) females. Most (70.1%) facilities were HCIIs and 72.7% were owned by the government. Malaria testing services were available at > 85% of facilities. AL was in stock at 300 (76.5%) facilities. Of those with a positive result, nearly all were prescribed an anti-malarial, with AL (95.1%) accounting for most prescriptions. Among those prescribed AL, 81.0% were given AL at the facility, lowest at HC IV (60.0%) and government owned (80.1%) facilities, corresponding to AL stock levels. Overall, 86.9% (95%CI 79.7, 90.7) of all enrolled patients received appropriate malaria case management. However, only 50.7% (21.2, 79.7) of patients seen at PFPs received appropriate malaria management. Conclusion: Adherence levels to malaria case management guidelines were good, but with gaps noted mainly in the private sector. The supply chain for AL needs to be strengthened. Interventions to improve practice at PFP facilities should be intensified.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernment of Uganda; Makerere University Research and Innovations Fund (MakRiF); Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship; East African Major Overseas Programmeen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.subjectMalariaen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare workersen_US
dc.subjectMalaria case managementen_US
dc.subjectBusoga Sub-regionen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectHeath centresen_US
dc.titleAdherence to malaria management guidelines by health care workers in the Busoga Sub-region, Eastern Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record